I'm not sure that I completely agree with Kierkegaard's argument for contemporaries of the God being on the same playing field as those of us who come after. I'm not sure how someone with direct knowledge, and direct observation of God's actions can be said to have equal interaction with God as someone who comes 2,000 years later. I think a chat with the incarnate God makes one a little bit closer than reading the testimony of an apostle 2,000 years after the fact. Do we all buy his reasoning on this topic?
0 comments:
Post a Comment