Kierkegaard seems to be creating a philosophy that justifies Christianity without explicitly using Christian language. Why do you think he is doing this? And does this have any connection to his claims at the end of most chapters that he knows his philosophy is nothing new?
1 comments:
Kierkegaard seems to be creating a philosophy that justifies Christianity without explicitly using Christian language. Why do you think he is doing this? And does this have any connection to his claims at the end of most chapters that he knows his philosophy is nothing new?
Post a Comment